🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, campaigners, and parents are watching intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Across Europe, a growing group of nations are considering similar measures.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that phones and networks are "robbing our children's youth". The policy may be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "an measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked parliament to approve a law raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised guardians to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the step does not create binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a good starting point," commented the European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Previously, interest grew behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to investigate the topic.

Charities have expressed concerns. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after encountering dangerous online content argues that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to build tools that are appropriate and suitable for minors," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, legislation is primarily unfolding at the state level amid federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule limiting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with extra time needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted measures demanding guardian approval for minors to open social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from certain politicians to copy the Australian path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Apart from Europe and the US, other countries are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies strike a more measured tone. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could backfire". The organization notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve safety.

As this worldwide debate unfolds, the steps of Australia and its followers show that policymakers globally are increasingly prepared to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.